SHAWN POLLY & FAMILY · WYNNEWOOD, OKLAHOMA

OUR FAMILY
DESERVES TO
BE HEARD.

Your friend is on the ground dying and you go through her door to save her life when EMT's tell you it is against their policy. Weeks later you are arrested & your apartment complex evicts you.

My name is Shawn Polly. I believed my fried Sharon needed urgent help, so I forced a door to reach her. Now the apartment complex had me arrested & evicted me before I was convicted of a crime. This has devestated my family.

ONE FAMILY. ONE HOME. A CHANCE TO BE HEARD.
My witnesses were never interviewed by the police or the apartment complex
SHAWN'S ACCOUNT

Guilty Before Convicted.

  1. My evidence will prove I did not break the law!
  2. Police, EMTs, and the apartment complex never mentioned my witnesses.
  3. The apartment complex has retaliated against me for years of complaints against them.
  4. The police report is inaccurate and the damage done is fabricated!
01 / SHAWN POLLY'S ACCOUNT

What
happened?

Shawn Polly believed his friend Sharon might be lying injured behind a locked door. He says he acted because he feared for her life.

Their family lived at Wynnewood Arms in Wynnewood, Oklahoma. Emergency medical responders told him his friend Sharon might have hit her head and was on the floor inside her locked apartment. He says the responders welcomed his help as he asked Sandra, Sharon's neighbor and their friend, whether she had a key.

Shawn says Sandra feared Sharon might be dying and urged him to help her. He recalls responders saying their policy did not allow them to enter & laughing and joking saying the door was hard to get in after his first attempt. Believing Sharon needed immediate help, he forced the door. Once he went through it, he says the responders told him they had the wrong apartment.

Shawn says the responders never ordered him away, told him to leave the scene, or refused his help. He disputes the account in the police report that he yelled and screamed at responders or prevented them from working. He says there are cameras at the apartment complex; if they captured audio and a recording of the event was preserved, he believes it would prove he was not yelling at the EMTs as described. He says he called out at Sandra's door and then at Sharon's door, asking whether Sharon was okay.

Shawn says the EMTs knew he had two witnesses. He says police knew of at least one witness because that person corresponded with them about the incident, but police did not interview that witness. He also says the EMTs' account in the police report omitted both witnesses. He believes the report misrepresents his actions and wants the witnesses and other evidence considered.

Shawn says the apartment complex knows he has multiple witnesses but has not asked for any of their statements to date.

After learning the responders had the wrong apartment, Shawn says he checked on his elderly friend Rosie across the complex because he feared she might be the person who fell. He told EMT's Rosie had recently undergone hip surgery but it was really back surgery. Rosie answered her door and told him she was okay. By then, he says, responders had found and entered the correct apartment.

Shawn is a Christian Minister. He and his wife say they ran a food ministry at Wynnewood Arms for roughly four months. Shawn says he fed around 20 to 30 residents a day from their apartment, mainly women, children, and elderly people. He says he and his wife has served in the community for years and built close friendships with over a dozen households. That connection is why the possibility of a neighbor in danger felt deeply personal.

Shawn was arrested and charged with malicious injury to property under $1,000 and interfering with emergency medical personnel. He disputes all allegations and maintains that concern for someone's safety motivated his actions.

This is Shawn Polly's account of disputed events. The charges are not findings of criminal guilt. We believe the full circumstances deserve to be heard.

SHAWN'S ACCOUNT / THE DOOR AND THE CHARGE

Did the apartment complex just commit fraud in order to upgrade my misdemeanor to a felony charge?

Shawn Polly believes the amount of damage claimed for Sharon's door has been exaggerated. Sandra says she will testify that the door had no damage and closed by itself. Sharon has said on audio the only problem she saw was a slightly wobbly hinge.

Cynthia Amos, a close friend of Sharon's, says Sharon told her that David, the maintenance worker who installed a replacement door, said a new door was unnecessary. This is Cynthia Amos's account; the maintenance worker's statement has not been independently verified here.

The apartment complex installed a new door on , almost two months after the incident. Two days before the installation, Shawn emailed the apartment complex saying he intended to sue. In that email, He said there was no property damage and that they had never made a repair.

He also wrote to the judge saying he believed the claimed damage amount had been fabricated to affect the charge against him. He told the judge that he had reported the apartment complex to HUD several times and that he believed his complaints had cost them thousands of dollars in bedbug treatments.

Because of the condition the witnesses describe and the timing after his email, He believes the apartment complex inflated the damage to try to turn a misdemeanor property charge into a felony. He wants the actual damage, replacement decision, and basis for any charge to be examined. This is his concern, not an established finding of fraud or a confirmed change in the charge.

Cynthia Amos recording ·

Listen to Cynthia's account of what Sharon told her about the replacement door. Sharon is not a speaker in this recording.

Open or download the recording (MP3)
02 / WHY I BELIEVE THIS IS RETALIATION

Proof the apartment complex retaliated against Mr. Polly

The apartment complex's October 6, 2026 Notice of Immediate Termination says alleged criminal activity threatening other residents' health, safety, or peaceful enjoyment is grounds to terminate Mr. Polly's lease. The notice cites Oklahoma law, federal regulations, and his lease.

The law cited in the notice

41 O.S. § 132(D) states:

Any criminal activity that threatens the health, safety or right of peaceful enjoyment of the premises by other tenants committed by a tenant or by any member of the tenant's household or any guest or other person under the tenant's control or is a danger to the premises and any drug-related criminal activity on or near the premises by the tenant or by any member of the tenant's household or any guest or other person under the tenant's control shall be grounds for immediate termination of the lease.

The notice additionally cites 24 C.F.R. §§ 247.3(a) and 247.4, which set grounds and notice requirements for terminating tenancies in covered subsidized housing. These provisions allow termination when their requirements are met; they do not require a landlord to evict everyone who is accused of a crime.

Mr. Polly says another man was involved in an incident at the complex in which he allegedly punched someone and was given a court date. Shawn says the man has continued to live there for more than a year after that incident and that the complex made him a maintenance worker. Mr. Polly has not seen the complex's records showing what it knew or how it evaluated the other man's case.

The complex used the criminal-activity rule to demand that Mr. Polly leave. He believes allowing the other man to stay and work there while applying the rule to him raises a serious question about fair and equal treatment. The man's court date alone does not establish guilt, but the apparent difference in how the two incidents were handled deserves an explanation.

There may be other residents who were treated differently under the same rule; Shawn does not yet have evidence of other cases. He wants the complex's past decisions examined. Mr. Polly believes this apparent selective enforcement adds to his concern that the action against him was retaliation for his earlier complaints to HUD.

MY ACCOUNT OF THE EMERGENCY RESPONSE

The inaccurate police report

I believe the EMTs' account in the police report leaves out important facts about what happened. It does not mention my witnesses Sandra or Rosie. The EMTs said I was yelling and screaming at them and preventing them from doing their job. I dispute that. Sandra was the one yelling at them. She said words to the effect of, “Get your f**king a** in there and save my friend, you sh*t bags.”

The EMTs also left out that they asked for my help. They told me someone was on the floor and they could not reach that person. How else would I have known that? They told me Sharon's apartment was the one they were trying to reach. The report makes it sound as though they were still waiting to confirm the correct unit, but that is not what they told me at the scene.

The EMTs were with me when they suggested knocking on Sandra's door to ask whether she had a key to Sharon's apartment. They followed me to Sandra's door while we tried to find a way in. We later learned they had identified the wrong apartment, after Sharon's door had been breached. I believe asking us to help gain entry to the wrong apartment was a serious mistake.

At no point did the EMTs tell me to stop helping or to stay 25 feet away. If they had told me to stop, I would have stopped. If they believed I was interfering, why did they tell me about the person's condition and follow me to Sandra's door to look for a key?

I believe the EMTs left out those facts and blamed me for yelling because they feared the consequences of their mistakes. Sandra was upset and cursed at them, but the report describes me as the aggressive one. In my view, their account makes it appear that I prevented them from working when they had asked for my help. I want Sandra's and Rosie's accounts, and the full sequence of what happened, to be considered.

The first time they threatened to evict me was for feeding elderly people from my apartment.

We were feeding 20 to 30 people from our apartment complex each day, mainly women, children, and older residents. Delbert's, a local grocery store, donated $20 worth of food a day to our food program. That was food for our neighbors, not income in my pocket. I believe the apartment complex treated those donations as if I was making money, accused me of unreported income, and threatened my home. I reject that accusation.

Twenty dollars a day in donated food helped feed our neighbors. I believe the apartment complex turned it into a threat against my home.

The June 19, 2024 notice alleges an unreported change in income or family composition. It warns that my rental assistance could be terminated and that I could be charged market rent. The notice does not mention Delbert's or the meals. The June 30 response sent on my behalf by The Forum Group disputes the allegation, addresses the prospect of eviction, and cites statutes. Those are the words on paper. My account is that the food donation was behind the accusation.

Since 2023, I have reported the apartment complex to HUD more than five times. After those reports and the pressure on my housing, I believe the current demand that I leave is retaliation. I want people to see the documents and hear why I believe my family is being targeted.

Redacted June 19, 2024 apartment complex notice warning that rental assistance could be terminated after an alleged unreported change
JUNE 19, 2024 · APARTMENT COMPLEX NOTICE

The notice I received

The apartment complex alleged an unreported change in income or household composition and warned about rental assistance and market rent.

Open redacted notice
Redacted June 30, 2024 response from The Forum Group to the apartment complex disputing the allegation and citing Oklahoma statutes
JUNE 30, 2024 · RESPONSE

The response sent on my behalf

The Forum Group disputed the allegation, discussed possible eviction, and cited Oklahoma statutes.

Open redacted response
MY EARLIER HUD COMPLAINTS

The first time I reported the apartment complex

Large green tent set up inside a living room
Shawn says he and his wife slept in this tent in their living room for more than six months. Each child had a tent in their own room. Open the photo

This is Shawn Polly's first-person account.

For more than six months after we moved in, my wife and I slept in a tent in our living room. Each of our children had a tent in their own room. We hoped that keeping the bedbugs from feeding on us would starve them and force them to leave. In my view, the infestation finally ended only after a neighbor in an adjoining apartment moved and the bugs could no longer reach us.

The apartment complex refused to use heat treatment because they said the heat could damage the linoleum flooring. Instead they used chemical spray that did not work. After the spraying, I lost some hearing in my left ear for about a year. I saw two ear specialists, but neither could determine whether the chemicals caused the hearing loss. My hearing eventually returned.

During our first six months at our apartment, I filed two separate complaints with HUD. The first was about the bedbugs and their treatment. The second raised my concern about waste of resources: I believed repeated chemical spraying was moving bedbugs between apartments for years instead of eliminating them. To me, that pattern raised concerns about waste and possible fraud.

I believe my complaints led to an investigation against them because sortly after several apartments came fort with bed bug complaints. I believe the apartment complex then treated several apartments, spent thousands of dollars doing so, and changed its written bedbug policy. I want that history considered when people ask why I believe the current housing pressure is retaliation for speaking up.

04 / DOCUMENTS & EVIDENCE

The record
matters.

Read the redacted notice and listen to Shawn's first recorded call with the apartment complex's attorney. Other materials will be added after review.

October 6 termination notice

Read the redacted notice (PDF, 2 pages)

AVAILABLE

First call with the apartment complex's attorney

Shawn says he asks for a grievance hearing and the evidence against him in this recording.

Open or download the recording (MP3)

AVAILABLE

Grievance hearing request

They never gave me a grievance hearing.

My friend Sharon admits she told the apartment complex there was no damage and they made her fill out a maintenance request form for damage.

Open or download Sharon's testimony (MP3)

AVAILABLE
Privacy first. Every recording and document must be reviewed for personal information before it is published.
06 / LOOKING AHEAD

Help Our Family Fight for Fair Treatment and Housing Stability

I am raising funds for a defense attorney, housing for my family, and a civil attorney. If I win my criminal case, I plan to sue the apartment complex with the civil attorney's help.

Send support by Zelle

Supporters can send a Zelle payment to Shawn Polly using the email adonai4you@gmail.com.